Case Details

The response of a site to a vibration source is very site specific, and it is almost always preferable to perform a measurement survey of the site. Base Isolation (mounting a building on a resilient foundation) is commonly assumed to be the most appropriate solution to vibration problems. Alternative vibration control options, directed at the source, propagation path and receiver should also be considered. The range of options may provide viable cost effective alternatives to Base Isolation, and may in some cases be used as supplementary measures to a Base Isolation proposal. No significance should be attached to the order of the alternative options listed, and the list is not exhaustive.

At Source – Industrial

  • Isolate source
  • Undertake maintenance on plant.
  • Alter design of plant.
  • Adopt different work practice.
  • Procure new plant.

Railway

  • Smoother running surface
  • Alter vehicle unsprung mass
  • Alter line speed
  • Resilient rail fixings, booted sleepers, track ballast mats or a floating track slab

Highway

  • Improve quality of running surface
  • Remove potholes refit loose manhole covers

Propagation Path

  • Increase propagation path, site building or sensitive parts far away from the source
  • Trenches in path between source and building
  • Concrete wall built into the ground between source and receiver (Impedance Wall)
  • Ground treatment to stiffen a layer of soil (Wave Impedance Block)

At Receiver

  • Rearrangement of plan (e.g. locate building far from source, switch location of car parks and landscaping into nearby areas)
  • Reconsider use of site (commercial may be less sensitive than residential)
  • Avoid floor resonance with dominant peaks in ground vibration spectrum (de-tune)
  • Solid ground bearing slabs may be preferential to suspended slabs (e.g. bungalows in place of two storey dwellings)
  • Unavoidable resonances targeted at frequencies of least Human sensitivity, usually requires high frequency (bandwidth may be broad, increasing risk of tuning with source)
  • Low natural frequency floors may avoid tuning with source (also a narrower bandwidth), but a risk of footfall induced vibration (see ISO 10137:1992)
  • A floor may constructed on isolators off a floor below (floating floor)
  • Isolate sensitive areas (box-within-a-box)
  • Isolate individual items of sensitive equipment
  • A dynamic system added to the primary system (Dynamic Vibration Absorber), to neutralise motion (at a specific frequency, where de-tuning cannot be achieved)
  • Select structural form for optimum damping (e.g. concrete in preference to steel)
  • Constrained layer floor damping treatments
  • Foundations taken into strata with less vibration, decouple from soil near surface
  • Sensitive equipment on ground rather than suspended floors, or equipment on foundation bearing deep in soil, and decoupled from building or soil near surface
  • Deploy traditional structural materials in a way that achieves a rigid body mount frequency comparable to that obtained with Base Isolation
  • Increase path length of vibration source to increase damping (e.g. suspend floors from tops of columns rather than supported from columns directly off the ground)
  • Irregular construction patterns and discontinuities in the construction
  • Heavier forms of construction
  • Increase background noise levels to mask intrusive noise
  • Active vibration control using electromechanical or hydraulic actuators (unlikely to be a viable option in all but special circumstances)
portfolio-single-1
portfolio-single-2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Management Style

Vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit.

Our Case Studies

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus.

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi.

Subscribe & get 20% off on your first project, Be with us

    Cart (0 items)

    Center for Applied Engineering Science

    Contact Info

    Mon - Frd : 8:00 -16:00
    +44 (0) 20 8647 1908
    +44 (0) 20 8405 2076
    ced@environmental.co.uk

    Office Address

    Civil Engineering Dynamics Ltd 8-11 Oak Walk, BedZED Centre Hackbridge, Surrey SM6 7DE